Evaluation of disinfection methods for anesthetic cartridges

Authors

  • Cristina Ramos De-Paiva Federal University of Amazonas
  • Rejane Laranja Bandeira Federal University of Amazonas
  • Andrezza Lauria de Moura Federal University of Amazonas
  • Carina Toda Federal University of Amazonas
  • Giorge Pessoa de Jesus Federal University of Amazonas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5935/2525-5711.20220185

Keywords:

Dentistry, disinfection, anesthetics

Abstract

This study proposes a methodology to disinfect anesthetic cartridges used in the dental clinics of the Federal University of Amazonas. The research used 50 glass and 50 plastic cartridges. The anesthetic cartridges were disinfected through two different methods: immersion and friction. The experiments were carried out in two distinct sets: microbiological test and experimental validation, using 70% Alcohol, Polyvinylpyrrolidone, 2% Chlorhexidine, and 0.5% Chlorhexidine with Alcohol. The analysis of the results was based on mean and standard deviation statistical estimators obtained by the MATLAB software. Experiments conducted on plastic cartridges employing immersion in disinfectants elucidated that 2% Chlorhexidine and 0.5% Chlorhexidine produced better results than 70% Alcohol and Polyvinylpyrrolidone. For the experiments with glass material, 70% Alcohol and 2% Chlorhexidine presented the best results. In the experiments with different types of friction disinfections on the plastic material, the disinfectants 70% Alcohol and Polyvinylpyrrolidone presented similar performances. The disinfectants 2% Chlorhexidine and 0.5% Chlorhexidine obtained the best results compared to disinfectants 70% Alcohol and Polyvinylpyrrolidone. The analysis of experiments carried out with friction disinfection on glass found that the disinfectants 2% Chlorhexidine and 0.5% Chlorhexidine were similar. Moreover, the 2% Chlorhexidine and 0.5% Chlorhexidine disinfectants outperformed 70% Alcohol and 2% Chlorhexidine. Considering the efficacy of disinfection by disinfectant solutions evaluated in this study, the friction method with 2% Chlorhexidine proved to be more effective with the different disinfection methods.

Author Biographies

Cristina Ramos De-Paiva, Federal University of Amazonas

Dental School - Manaus - Amazonas - Brasil

Rejane Laranja Bandeira, Federal University of Amazonas

Dental School - Manaus - Amazonas - Brasil

Andrezza Lauria de Moura, Federal University of Amazonas

Dental School - Manaus - Amazonas - Brasil

Carina Toda, Federal University of Amazonas

Dental School - Manaus - Amazonas - Brasil

Giorge Pessoa de Jesus, Federal University of Amazonas

Dental School - Manaus - Amazonas - Brasil

References

Guimarães JJ. Biosecurity and control of cross infection in dental offices. São Paulo: Santos; 2001.

Rutala WA, Weber DJ. How to asses risk of disease transmission to patients when there is a failure to follow recommended disinfection and sterilization guidelines. Infect Control Infect Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;28(2):146-55.

Schaefer ME. Infection control: dealing with the special patient. Art Scie Dent. 1994;22(8):20-4.

Rutala WA, Weber DJ. New disinfection and sterilization methods. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Mar/Apr;32(1):1348-56.

Graziano KU, Silva A, Bianchi ERF. Cleaning, disinfection, sterilization of articles and antisepsis. In: Fernandes AT, Fernandes MOV, Ribeiro Filho N, orgs. Infecção hospitalar e suas interfaces na área da saúde. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2000. p. 215-65.

Matsuda JK, Grinbaum RS, Davidowicz H. The assessment of infection control in dental practices in the municipality of São Paulo. Braz J Infect Dis. 2011 Feb;15(1):45-51.

Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): emerging and future challenges for dental and oral medicine. J Dental Res. 2012 Mar;99(5):481-7.

Basson NJ, Bester L, Van Der Bijl P. External bacterial contamination of local anaesthetic cartridges. SADJ. 1999 Jun;54(6):253-6.

Ranjbari M, Yaghmaei M, Hakemi-Vala M, Hosseinpour S. Assessment of bacterial contamination of the external surface of anesthetic cartridges. J Dent School. 2015;33(4):277-81.

Chutter RJ. The rationale and method for autoclaving anesthetic cartridges for surgical trays. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jan;105(1)e:1-e4.

Pauletti JRA, Lauermann FD, Savy CM, Corsetti A, Freddo AL. Efetividade de agentes químicos na desinfecção de tubetes anestésicos. RFO. 2017 Jan/Apr;22(1):54-7.

Gonçalves e Silva CR, Jorge AOC. Evaluation of surface disinfectants utilized in dentistry. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2002 Apr/Jun;16(2):107-14.

Payne GS. Sterelization in desinfection in the orthodontic office: a practical approach. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986 Sep;90(3):250-2.

Feist IS, Micheli RS. Clorexidina - prós e contras. Rev APCD. 1989 Jan/Feb;43(1):20-3.

Vignarajah S. Simplified cross-infection control: a study of cost, time and patient flow in Antigua. Int Dent J. 1991 Dec;41(6):335-40.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-01

How to Cite

1.
De-Paiva CR, Bandeira RL, Moura AL de, Toda C, Jesus GP de. Evaluation of disinfection methods for anesthetic cartridges. J Oral Diagn [Internet]. 2022 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Sep. 19];7:1-7. Available from: https://jordi.com.br/revista/article/view/25

Issue

Section

Original Article