Optimal Selection of COVID-19 Serological Testing Kits

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5935/2525-5711.20200022

Keywords:

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus, Saudi Arabia, Quality Control

Abstract

Immunization is the ultimate objective to ensure safe return, for schools and jobs to be open. Fortunately, the government of Saudi Arabia had announced that Clinical trials for SARS-CoV-2 will start in August 2020. There is need to evaluate immune response among vaccinated individuals and recovered patients. The market is full of different commercial tests promoted for the health care providers. An accurate selection of tests is crucial specially that are approved by international authorities the FDA-CDC. By August 2020, forty-seven serology tests were authorized by the FDA-CDC under the -EAU emergency. The accuracy and reliability of the serological tests is reflected by the sensitivity and specificity of the test. However, serological testing has an inherent problem of false positive and false negative that are associated with tests. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity values are not enough indicators for the interpretation of the results specially in variation of the prevalence rate. The positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated from sensitivity and specificity of 47 tests at different prevalence rates to show its effect on the interpretation of results at different populations. In conclusion, it is time to use serological testing for the public to return to normal life. Selecting the proper serological kit depends heavily on the specificity, more than the sensitivity, of the test and the prevalence of the disease among the group tested. In lower prevalence population use two kits to increase the PPV and reliability of the results.

Author Biography

Ibraheem Ashankyty, King Abdulaziz University

Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

References

Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species severe acute respiratory syndromerelated coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020 Apr;5(4):563-44.

Signorelli C, Scognamiglio T, Odone A. COVID-19 in Italy: impact of containment measures and prevalence estimates of infection in the general population. Acta Biomed. 2020 Apr;91(3-S):175-9.

Mi YN, Huang TT, Zhang JX, Qin Q, Gong YX, Liu SY, et al. Estimating the instatnt case fatility rate of COVID-19 in China. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;97:1-6.

GeurtsvanKessel CH, Okba NMA, Igloi Z, Bogers S, Embregts CWE, Laksono BM, et al. An evaluation of COVID-19 serological assays informs future diagnostics and exposure assessment. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3436.

World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2020; [access in 2020 Sep 22]. Available from: http://who.sprinklr.com

Kissler SM, Tedijanto C, Goldstein E, Grad YH, Lipsitch M. Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the post-pandemic period. Science. 2020 May;368(6493):860-8.

Long QX, Liu BZ, Deng HJ, Wu GC, Deng K, Chen YK, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020;26(6):845-8.

Okba NMA, Müller MA, Li W, Wang C, GeurtsvanKessel CH, Corman VM, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibody responses in coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1478-88.

Bryant JE, Azman AS, Ferrari MJ, Amold BF, Boni MF, Boum Y, et al. Serology for SARS-CoV-2: apprehensions, opportunities, and the path forward. Sci Immunol. 2020;5:eabc6347.

Wolfel R, Corman VM, Goggemos W, Seilmaier M, Zange S, Müller MA, et al. Virology assesment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-9.

Chan JFW, Wong CCY, To KKW, Tang THC, Wong SCY, Leung KH, et al. Improved molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 by the novel, highly sensitive and specific COVID-19-RdRp/Hel real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR assay validated in vitro and with clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr;58(5):e00310-20.

Mathur G, Mathur S. Antibody testing for COVID-19. Can it be used as a screening tool in areas with low prevalence?. Am J Clin Pathol. 2020;aqaa082.

Tang YW, Schmitz JE, Persing DH, Stratton CW. The laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 infection: current issues and challenges. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May;58(6):e00512-20.

Mathur G, Mathur S. Antibody testing for COVID-19 can it be use as a screening tool in areas with low prevalence?. Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Jul;154(1):1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCP/AQAA082

US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Emergency use authorization [Internet]. White Oak, MA: FDA; 2020 Aug; [access in 2020 Aug 27]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization

Downloads

Published

2020-01-11

How to Cite

1.
Ashankyty I. Optimal Selection of COVID-19 Serological Testing Kits. J Oral Diagn [Internet]. 2020 Jan. 11 [cited 2024 Sep. 19];5:1-8. Available from: https://jordi.com.br/revista/article/view/91

Issue

Section

Original Article